GOAP Execution Visualization
Critical Path Diagram
TIME →
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
DAY 1: FOUNDATION (Parallel - 7h wall time)
┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ Task Planner │ │ Change Preview │ │ Ruvector Bridge │ │ Site Context │
│ [5] 7h SPARC │ │ [4] 5h SPARC │ │ [4] 5h SPARC │ │ [4] 5h SPARC │
│ Agent: Research │ │ Agent: Coder │ │ Agent: Coder │ │ Agent: Analyzer │
└────────┬────────┘ └────────┬────────┘ └────────┬────────┘ └────────┬────────┘
│ │ │ │
└────────────────────┴─────────────────────┴─────────────────────┘
↓
Checkpoint: FOUNDATION
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
DAY 2: SPECIALIZATION (Parallel - 4h wall time)
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Intent │ │ Diff │ │ Search │ │ Graph │ │ Site │
│ Classifier │ │ Generator │ │ Integration │ │ Integration │ │ Structure │
│ [3] 4h │ │ [2] 3h │ │ [2] 3h │ │ [2] 3h │ │ [2] 3h │
│ ↑ from A1 │ │ ↑ from A2 │ │ ↑ from A3 │ │ ↑ from A3 │ │ ↑ from A4 │
└──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘
│ │ │ │ │
└────────────────┴─────────────────┴────────────────┴─────────────────┘
↓
Checkpoint: SPECIALIZATION
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
DAY 3: ADVANCED FEATURES (Parallel - 4h wall time)
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Action │ │ Preview │ │Recommenda- │ │ Schema │
│ Generator │ │ Formatter │ │ tions │ │ Detector │
│ [3] 4h │ │ [2] 3h │ │ [2] 3h │ │ [2] 2h │
│ ↑ from A5 │ │ ↑ from A6 │ │ ↑ from A7 │ │ ↑ from A9 │
└──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘
│ │ │ │
└────────────────┴─────────────────┴─────────────────┘
↓
Checkpoint: ADVANCED FEATURES
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
DAY 4-5: WORKFLOW & INTEGRATION (Sequential - 15h wall time)
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Approval Workflow │
│ [4] 5h SPARC │
│ ↑ from A1 + A2 │
└──────────┬──────────┘
│
↓
┌─────────────────────┐
│ State Machine │
│ [2] 4h │
└──────────┬──────────┘
│
↓
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Integrate All │
│ Modules [4] 6h │
│ ↑ from all above │
└──────────┬──────────┘
↓
Checkpoint: INTEGRATION
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
DAY 6: QUALITY ASSURANCE (Parallel - 3h wall time)
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Test │ │ Test │ │ Test │ │ Test │ │ Test │
│ Task │ │ Change │ │ Ruvector │ │ Site │ │ Approval │
│ Planner │ │ Preview │ │ Bridge │ │ Context │ │ Workflow │
│ [2] 3h │ │ [2] 3h │ │ [2] 3h │ │ [2] 3h │ │ [2] 3h │
└────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘
│ │ │ │ │
└─────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────┘
↓
Checkpoint: QA COMPLETE
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
DAY 7: DOCUMENTATION (Sequential - 3h wall time)
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Documentation │
│ [2] 3h │
│ ↑ from all tests │
└──────────┬──────────┘
↓
✓ GOAL ACHIEVED
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Dependency Graph (DAG)
Legend: [Action] (Cost) → depends on
LAYER 0 (Parallel Foundation)
[A1: Task Planner] (5)
[A2: Change Preview] (4)
[A3: Ruvector Bridge] (4)
[A4: Site Context] (4)
↓
─────────────────────
↓
LAYER 1 (Parallel Specialization)
[A5: Intent Classifier] (3) → A1
[A6: Diff Generator] (2) → A2
[A7: Search Integration] (2) → A3
[A8: Graph Integration] (2) → A3
[A9: Site Structure] (2) → A4
↓
─────────────────────
↓
LAYER 2 (Parallel Advanced)
[A10: Action Generator] (3) → A5
[A11: Preview Formatter] (2) → A6
[A12: Recommendations] (2) → A7
[A13: Schema Detector] (2) → A9
↓
─────────────────────
↓
LAYER 3 (Sequential Workflow)
[A14: Approval Workflow] (4) → A1, A2
↓
[A15: State Machine] (2) → A14
↓
─────────────────────
↓
LAYER 4 (Integration)
[A16: Integrate Modules] (4) → ALL ABOVE
↓
─────────────────────
↓
LAYER 5 (Parallel Testing)
[A17-A21: Module Tests] (2 each) → respective modules
↓
─────────────────────
↓
LAYER 6 (Documentation)
[A22: Documentation] (2) → ALL TESTS
↓
═══════════════════
COMPLETE
State Evolution Timeline
T₀ (Start)
├─ has_basic_agent: true
├─ has_memory_system: true
└─ has_ruvector_modules: true
T₁ (After Foundation - Day 1)
├─ has_task_planner: true ✓
├─ has_change_preview: true ✓
├─ has_ruvector_integration: true (partial) ✓
└─ has_site_context: true ✓
T₂ (After Specialization - Day 2)
├─ can_classify_intents: true ✓
├─ can_generate_diffs: true ✓
├─ can_search_semantically: true ✓
├─ can_query_graph: true ✓
└─ knows_site_structure: true ✓
T₃ (After Advanced - Day 3)
├─ can_generate_actions: true ✓
├─ can_format_previews: true ✓
├─ can_get_recommendations: true ✓
└─ knows_content_schemas: true ✓
T₄ (After Workflow - Day 5)
├─ has_approval_workflow: true ✓
└─ has_workflow_states: true ✓
T₅ (After Integration - Day 5)
├─ agent_handles_complex_nlp: true ✓
└─ user_sees_plan_before_execution: true ✓
T₆ (After QA - Day 6)
└─ all_modules_tested: true ✓
T₇ (Final - Day 7)
└─ documentation_complete: true ✓
→ GOAL STATE ACHIEVED
Cost Analysis
Cumulative Cost by Phase
Phase 1: Cost = 17 (Running: 17)
Phase 2: Cost = 11 (Running: 28)
Phase 3: Cost = 9 (Running: 37)
Phase 4: Cost = 6 (Running: 43)
Phase 5: Cost = 4 (Running: 47)
Phase 6: Cost = 10 (Running: 57)
Phase 7: Cost = 2 (Running: 59) ← TOTAL COST
Note: Initial estimate was 55, actual 59 (includes all sub-actions)
Cost Distribution by Action Type
Major Modules (SPARC): 17 (Foundation)
Sub-Modules: 20 (Specialization + Advanced)
Workflow: 6 (Approval system)
Integration: 4 (System-wide)
Testing: 10 (QA)
Documentation: 2 (Docs)
───
Total: 59
Parallelism Efficiency
Sequential Execution: 94 hours
Parallel Execution: 36 hours
Speedup Factor: 2.6x
Efficiency: 65% (2.6/4.0 theoretical max)
Parallelism by Phase:
Phase 1: 4 agents → 7h (28h sequential → 7h parallel = 4.0x)
Phase 2: 5 agents → 4h (20h sequential → 4h parallel = 5.0x)
Phase 3: 4 agents → 4h (16h sequential → 4h parallel = 4.0x)
Phase 4: 1 agent → 9h (9h sequential → 9h parallel = 1.0x)
Phase 5: 1 agent → 6h (6h sequential → 6h parallel = 1.0x)
Phase 6: 5 agents → 3h (15h sequential → 3h parallel = 5.0x)
Phase 7: 1 agent → 3h (3h sequential → 3h parallel = 1.0x)
Agent Workload Distribution
Agent Type | Phases | Hours | Utilization
─────────────────────────────────────────────
researcher | 1-2 | 11 | 31%
coder | 1-3 | 22 | 61%
code-analyzer | 1-2 | 11 | 31%
system-architect| 4-5 | 15 | 42%
tester | 6 | 15 | 42%
api-docs | 7 | 3 | 8%
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Total 77h (parallel time excludes overlap)
Critical Path Identification
CRITICAL PATH (Longest dependency chain):
A1 → A5 → A10 → A14 → A15 → A16 → A17 → A22
Breakdown:
├─ A1: Task Planner (7h)
├─ A5: Intent Classifier (4h)
├─ A10: Action Generator (4h)
├─ A14: Approval Workflow (5h)
├─ A15: State Machine (4h)
├─ A16: Integrate Modules (6h)
├─ A17: Test Task Planner (3h)
└─ A22: Documentation (3h)
───
Total: 36h (matches parallel execution time)
This is the MINIMUM time to completion regardless of agent count.
Bottleneck Analysis
Sequential Bottlenecks (Cannot parallelize)
- Phase 4: Approval Workflow + State Machine (9h)
- Requires completion of Task Planner and Change Preview
- Complex state machine logic requires focused attention
- Phase 5: Integration (6h)
- Must wait for all modules
- System-wide changes require single architect
Mitigation Strategies
- Pre-plan integration architecture during Phase 1
- Document integration points early
- Use mocks/stubs to test integration patterns before modules complete
Resource Contention Points
Shared Resources
- Memory System: All agents read/write
- Mitigation: Namespace isolation
- Coordination via hooks
- File System: Concurrent edits
- Mitigation: Separate file ownership
- Use git branches for isolation
- Test Environment: Testing conflicts
- Mitigation: Parallel test runners
- Isolated test fixtures
Replanning Triggers
If any of these conditions occur, replan:
- Action fails after 2 retries
- Recalculate path from current state
- Consider alternative actions
- Dependencies change
- New preconditions discovered
- Existing preconditions invalid
- Time overruns >50%
- Reassess remaining estimates
- Adjust parallelism
- Agent failures
- Reassign work
- Spawn replacement agents
- Scope changes
- User adds requirements
- Technical constraints discovered